The Double Recovery of Arctic Sea Ice

Just two months ago we learned that Arctic Sea Ice Is Normal For The First Time In At Least Seven Years

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/nsidc-arctic-ice-extent-normal-for-the-first-time-in-at-least-seven-years/

Now we are told that Arctic Sea Ice is the lowest on record for the time of year.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

Just what is going on?
Lets ignore what the so-called "scientists" say and look instead to the wealth of knowledge Blog Science has built up about Arctic sea ice over the years:

Watt's Law: A record low in Arctic ice is a sign that a Recovery has begun. Such an event occurred in summer 2007.

Goddard's Law: If arctic sea ice reaches normal levels it is clear proof that a recovery is in progress.

The Monckton Conjecture: Arctic ice extent is just fine: steady for a decade.

So we can see that normal levels of ice in April means that The Recovery since 2007 is progressing well. The more recent record low is a sign that a new recovery has begun (watt's law). So we now have two Arctic sea ice recoveries running in parallel and amplifying each other through solar magneto-reluctance. This is very inconvenient for IPCC alarmists and their communist handlers.

Prediction
Arctic sea ice will now recover double fast. It may even melt out completely in a coming summer and thus initiate a third recovery which will be the final nail in the coffin of man-made global warming.

Summer Shattered: No Warming Since February

IPCC "scientists" predict that every year there should be a period known as "Summer" in the Northern Hemisphere. The IPCC prediction is for 3C/month warming between February and May:

But inconveniently for Micheal Mann the temperature this year in 2012 has been flat between February and the beginning of May:

That's almost three months without any increase in temperature. This clearly falsifies the theories of climate scientists and means we should ignore anything they say. If you disagree then please stare without blinking at these lines until it sinks in:

The IPCC scientists' own graph above is very clear that they expected a smooth 6C increase in temperature between February and May which just hasn't happened. Is it a coincidence that the 2007 IPCC report doesn't mention anything about the inconvenient 2012 temperature data?

Alarmists will try to wriggle out of this by saying "blah blah blah three months is not long enough", "blah blah blah noise", "blah blah blah we are going to increase your taxes anyway", etc. I know all of their arguments - I have read most of the Internet, which is surely why Al Gore has turned down all my offers to debate him on Live TV at the Whitehouse. I even offered to waive half my usual fee.

Sidebar: When and When Not to Trust Data

• DO trust data when it is promoted by a trusted figure such as Laird Monckton, Dr Professor Ian Plimer, or anyone with Solar based climate theory.
• DONT trust data if it toes an IPCC line. We know the IPCC is always wrong so if data is compatible with man-made global warming in any way, it must be political data with an agenda and cannot be trusted.
• DONT trust nature. Nature itself will sometimes conspire with the alarmists and fabricate political data about itself. Even raw data can lie. For example some glaciers are in decline even though we should be entering an ice age. I have my suspicions that if nature could vote it would vote Obama.
• DO trust data if it contradicts the IPCC. Temperature data that exhibit a lack of warming can automatically be trusted and should be used immediately.
• NEVER trust supposed copies of Birth Certificates issued from Hawaii.

In the case of the Central England Temperature record I would not normally trust data from the Hadley Center, but in this case the Central England Temperature record makes such a convenient argument that I stand 100% behind the data. In fact I trust it even more than the Hadley Center do as I strongly believe it represents not just Central England Temperature but Global Temperature. Not of course that I concede such a hypothetical climate "science" concept as "Global Temperature" exists, I don't. But global temperature is definitely dropping and taking us into a new ice age.

What Consensus?

Dozens Of Murderers Renounce Belief In Global Warming

The UN Mandated theory of Global Warming received another set back today as dozens of murderers, who had previously accepted the theory, renounced their belief in Global Warming and signed a petition for inaction.

 It has long been a thorn in the side of climate deniers that so many murderers accept global warming, now the tables seem to be turning. "This is a wakeup call", said Professor Coal of the Heartless Institute, "with such an array of famous murderers rallying against the UN Greenhouse Theory of Gases, how can anyone claim the science is settled? We've even bagged the unabomber".

The government response has been harsh. Almost all of the murderers on the list are either dead or have been imprisoned. "This is why we hide in the mountains - the UN are coming for us too", notes Professor Coal, "Osama Bin Laden's next video release was purported to denounce the 'infidel physics of the CO2 molecule', but it was never shown. His "Hide the decline" Pakistan tour was inadvertently canceled when President Obama ordered US Special Forces to assassinate him at the behest of the National Science Foundation.".

Sunday Smear
Time for the Sunday Smear by our in-house cartoonist Tosh. This week UN Science Types are literally exposed when their UN Gravy Train suffers a humiliating derailment. Perhaps it collided with Scientific Fact coming the other way?

What Were They Thinking?!

For crying out loud, don't sign your name under it! 

Get SEPP or CSCDGC, or one of the other groups no-one gives a shit about to sign it

Global Warming A Hoax Say 7 Dwarfs

7 Top Climate Experts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden this week criticizing the agency for advocating man-made CO2 as a major cause of climate change. NASA is increasingly finding itself under pressure as more world renowned experts speak out. Only last week 101 Dalmatians signed a petition calling for the mass resignation of all climate scientists and the 3 Musketeers are known to have concerns. Below is the letter in full.

Dear NASA,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies desist from communicating with the public. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are unsubstantiated and inconvenient, especially when considering CO2 is heavier than air and coal mining is great. With millions of well-known climate scientists and billions of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in catastrophic forecasts, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.

At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact the Coal Lobby Institute, the Union of Concerned Coal Miners, or others they can recommend to you.

Sincerely,

(Attached signatures)

Dopey,
Sleazy,
Reckless,
Tricky,
Dirty,
Wasteful,
Doc (PhD)