Lessons From Japan
If there is one thing the media reaction to Fukushima shows, it is that Greens don't know whether they support Nuclear Power or whether they oppose it. This troubles me because how am I supposed to know what position to take on Nuclear Power if I don't know which position is very not the IPCC? If only Al Gore would announce to the IPCC what the official Green policy is on nuclear power.
Some environmentalists are opposed to nuclear power on so-called "safety" grounds, while others are pro-nuclear power because apparently nuclear power plants don't emit CO2, which is a terrible fact. You'd have thought in the 21st century someone would have developed a way to get the best of both worlds. A coal powered nuclear power station perhaps.
Don't get me wrong, I fully support radiation, I just don't trust nuclear power. I don't have a bad word to say about radiation. My job is to deny any negative industrial or commercial effect that alarms others. Radiation, climate change, DDT, etc, i've been funded to deny the lot. Like all industrial byproducts, I say radiation is entirely natural and it turns out radiation is good for your health.
Greens are always blathering on about "emissions". Yap yap yap. "Hey inferno those radiation emissions are too high". Whatever, I call it life. Radiation levels on Earth were much higher in the past. Who gets to decide that current levels of radiation are optimal for man? If anything the Earth is probably starved of radiation.
How many birds have been minced up by nuclear power plants ?
ReplyDeleteHow many birds have been fried in microwave ovens ?
Radiation levels are always changing , even before humans YAAAAAAAH
As soon as you mentioned DDT i could see what would be coming next ,
ReplyDeleteThe Poor Poor , lets all feel guilty about the poor poor,
what have the Poor ever done for us?
spending their lives polluting by cooking and lighting using cow dung ,
cow dung is fertilizer not flamin fuel,
then what happens when you give them a months work? what do they do with the money?
they buy one and a half polluting candles and
use them to pollute while they still cook with cow dung , why not at least cook with the candles ?
The poor are destroying the planet ,breed ,breed, breed , haven't they heard about overpopulation,
Dont send them money they waste it on fossil fuel, candles
Just like a bowl of Froot Loops cereal is a good source of vitamins and other essential nutrients, nuculear power is a good source of healthy radio-ation. The real problem with nuculear power is that the radiatoration is usually hoarded away all at one location. So we all pay money to dump perfectly good heat at nuculear plants and then pay more money to heat our holmes. That's not dope! That's wack!
ReplyDeleteThe nuculear industry can change that, by giving radiation waves to all of us. By cutting their radioaction waste into very small particles, which are then inserted into a whole big bunch of manufactured products - a car that doesn't need to be warmed up on a cold winter morning, a hot water heater that uses 25% less power, a crib that keeps baby warm without having to be plugged in. The possibilities are endless and there's bonus Alpha, Beta and Gamma particles to help us maintain our health! Fund it!
I think it's the slightly more reasonable and realistic part of the ICPC that sees the advantages of nuclear power, and it's the hard-core eco-nazis, eco-communists and eco-fascists that truly oppose it. Like genetical modification, these technologies are God's gift to the Christian nations to dominate the world and ultimately the universe. The only mistake we've made is to share this technology with the godless Japanese, and now we see the consequences!
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work ,these posts keep getting better and better .i would like to request you to one more post about that keep it up.I wonder how you got so good. This is really a fascinating blog, lots of stuff that I can get into.
ReplyDelete