Sunday, 15 November 2009

450 Peer-Reviewed Papers To Support Your Arguments Against So-Called "science"

Some books. Yes I know they are not the peer-reviewed papers in question, but if other blogs got away with a photo of a few folders I think I can get away with a photo of a few books. At least my image is public domain.

Someone has made another skeptic list! A list of papers that make various arguments against manmade global warming. The list of papers supporting skepticism of so-called "science" is so long that I can't even post it here. I have to use an Internet Linked URL instead:

http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

Bear in mind these 450 papers are the tip of a growing iceberg that refuses to melt, so in a way this is yet more evidence of cooling. The 450 only includes a small sample of total papers supporting skepticism because we know there are at least 30,000 scientists skeptical of manmade global warming on the Oregon Petition and I find it hard to believe they haven't all published at least one paper each. The list also doesn't include peer reviewed blog posts or peer reviewed blog comments.

Usually peer review is a sign of "team science". We spit on "peer review", it's not perfect so it doesn't meet our high standards of absolute proof. But in this case peer review is a sign that these papers carry authority because the peers are skeptics. Some of them have even been published in the high impact journal Energy and Environment, the journal that climate "scientists" can only dream of being published in.

How to read scientific papers

The benefit of the list is that you don't have to read them, you can just copy paste the entire list all over the internet. But if you do want to read some of the papers on the list you should take the following advice to make sure you don't do it wrong.

Never read papers in context of other papers. This is the mistake warmists make. Global warming skeptics know that reading papers is not an exercise in understanding the state of the science, but an exercise of finding spanners to throw in the wheels of manmade global warming. Find some nice arguments to bash warmists with but for heavens sake don't analyze the arguments in context of other papers.

Why you say? Well if you try to compile and understanding of how nature works from the 450 list you will only get confused. For example some of the arguments include:

  • Global temperature has risen naturally
  • Global temperature hasn't risen
  • Global temperature doesn't exist
  • The greenhouse effect is saturated
  • The greenhouse effect doesn't exist

They are all good arguments to support our skepticism if taken individually, but not if you think about them all at once. Try to divide the arguments into separate compartments in your head so they won't merge into one another in a baffling contradiction. You can still throw all of the above arguments at warmists, it's bound to confuse them. Make sure you assert the papers have "shown" or "proven" the argument is true. There are also some great political speeches in some of the papers and one uses an introduction quote by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.

Update: In error I had written "Energy and Environment, the journal that climate "scientists" can only dread of being published in". I have now corrected "dread", to "dream". This was an unfortunate typo. If you have blog expert reviewer status please take the updated version before you review, thanks.

76 comments:

  1. I saw a comment today that said Energy and Environment is to peer reviewed journals what Health and Efficiency is to The Lancet. And some disgusting comment about denialati (sic) porn (sic).

    Such wanton ad hominem only shows the warmists are getting scared.

    I mean, if I wanted porn, I'd download it like anybody else. And besides, not very many newsagents even stock plain brown wrappers these days.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This article is great and I like it very much.Thank your for your sharing.

      Delete
  2. You guys can pack it up.

    I have cornered the market.

    --Dr. MasterTech

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have read the list of 450 paper and can confirm that it is very scientific, very long, very robust and references many topics. They look very creidlbe, too, becuase the authors are listed with their first names as just initials, a mark of good science.

    Many of the papers are available on the Internet, too, becuase these paper writers are not afraid of being open and honest with their research.

    Many of these papers have only been submitted to "peer reviewed" journals. I think this is proof that the scientific conspiarcy to advance the warming agenda and cash in on offset $$$ is falling apart. Indeed -- why would they even TAKE SUBMISSIONS of something that disproves their theory? If they were better at their conspiracy, they wouldn't even let Blog Scientists submit their papers.

    So easy to see through their lies.

    You are the heroes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree Blog expert reviewers at RealClimate.org can only dream of lists like this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ...almost forgot, when those warmist, socialist economic illiterate, Blog expert reviewers at RealClimate.org attack our devastating evidence as "incoherent" let them know it is just a reference! Those crazy environmental media service shills at RealClimate.org won't know what hit them!

    I am concerned however that they may apply the Briffa method of counting combined with a Mannian smoothing technique to reduce the numbers of papers. In which case it will take nothing short of a congressional investigation to refute. [DO NOT BRING THIS IDEA UP TO THEM - LETS KEEP THIS IN PRIVATE HERE ON THE INTERNET]

    ReplyDelete
  6. Professor Squareroot19 November 2009 01:31

    The incriminating evidence just keeps piling up. I wouldn't want be in the warmist's shoes right now, they hardly have a leg to stand on.

    H/t to Dr Inferno for the choice of photograph introducing this splendid article.

    The reference manual at the top of the stack of books showing the exposed core of the tree material being analysed, the precision scientific equipment used to carry out the experiment, and the sample of what is obvious to a trained eye is a varve-rich lake sediment impressed me in particular. Subtle, yet within the grasp of the layman.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dr Inferno,

    Another tour de force, I salute you (and well done on quickly acknowledging the error with dread/dream - if only HADCRUT would respond as quickly).

    I was particularly impressed by your lucid explanation of how we should keep multiple arguments in different compartments in our brains.

    It strikes me that this is similar to a quantum computer, where all possible arguments are swirling around, only to coalesce when the lights are turned on.

    In our case, it is as though the lights are permanently off, enabling us to comprehend the infinity of possibilities at once.

    Warmists, of course, are unable to hold conflicting viewpoints simultaneously, which forces them into a linear way of thinking that denies them our insights and the purity of our essence.

    Dirk,
    Blog Science Expert Reviewer
    85 posts to Blog Professorship

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wrinkled Retainer19 November 2009 08:50

    Excellent work Prof Inferno.

    I suggest we all read the section

    Why you say? Well if you try to compile and understanding of how nature works from the 450 list you will only get confused. For example some of the arguments include:

    Global temperature has risen naturally
    Global temperature hasn't risen
    Global temperature doesn't exist
    The greenhouse effect is saturated
    The greenhouse effect doesn't exist

    They are all good arguments to support our skepticism if taken individually, but not if you think about them all at once. Try to divide the arguments into separate compartments in your head so they won't merge into one another in a baffling contradiction. You can still throw all of the above arguments at warmists, it's bound to confuse them.

    many times over until it becomes second nature. It is the very essence of Blog Science Anti-Warmism.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wrinkled Retainer19 November 2009 09:08

    Friends,

    We should be humbled and honoured. One of the greatest Blog Science minds of our time, the very author of this irrefutable list of impeccably credentialled papers, is among us.

    This is none other than Andrew, Professor Pop Tart himself.

    Is there anyone with greater vision and greater understanding of not only Warmist Anti-Science but also the evil ecofascist environazi politics behind it all?

    Prof Tart's case is so strong that the warmists try to censor what he says. He has been waging a war since June for Truth, Freedom, and Blog Science at the so-called Sceptic site the James Randi Educational Forum. The attacks upon him are without precedent and show that the warmists are desperate as their pack of cards is about to collapse.

    He has also heroically defended his work at the anti-freedom blog Greenfyre, where no one has been able to refute a single one of his statements and they have resorted to nothing more than ad hominem attacks.

    Prof Tart, we salute you!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'll tell you what I think of peer review: Peer review is intellectual inbreeding that's what it is. You pat my back then I'll scratch yours. And see where that peer review got us: the internet is now infested with peer-to-peer networks that 'share' all kinds of pirated stuff like the latest version of Lotus 1-2-3 and Wordstar and Windows 95.

    It is all done of course on these Linux computers that are just a communist backdoor right into the harts of our economies: the banking systems. We have all seen where that got us with the global credit crunch. I traced that Linux virus back to a Chinese programmer named Bei-Lin (Lin - Linux, got it?). It won't be long until we are all working in the rice fields singing hymns for Al Gore and Jim Hansen.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Lord Monkeyston19 November 2009 10:59

    I'm a peer and I can assure you that I have personally reviewed all those articles in Energy & Environment!

    Where are they all today, those bed-wetting moaning Minnies of the Apocalyptic Traffic-Light Tendency – those Greens too yellow to admit they’re really Reds?

    Si decem habeas linguas, mutum esse addecet.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Never read papers in context of other papers"

    It is a common mistake made by beginners to insist on context. I mean, that is like eating your french fries in context in a potato field in France. And they're called freedom fries anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hmm, I see many papers have been published in 'regular' science journals such as the Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service, which is of course suspicous. Has anybody actually checked if all these papers are anti-warmist enough? Personally I would only trust papers that have been published in top journals such as the Answers Research Journal or the International Journal for Creation Research.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Slaghammer for the truth19 November 2009 14:58

    PEER REVIEWED BASTARDS CAN GO TO HELL.

    Discussion closed.

    ReplyDelete
  15. For those who think 450 is not enough I did some real blog science research. I typed in Google "anti global warming" and got 691,000 hits. Then I searched for "pro global warming" and got only 218,000 hits. Do we live in a democracy or not?

    I rest my case.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This is a bit off-topic gentlemen, however, the political debate about climate change is often seen as being derailed by and in competition with the controversy over the health care "reform" legislation. So it is a bit connected.

    And today there has been an explosion of epic proportions on the talk radio and the intertubes, since a government task force has reversed decades of advice, and now contends that women under 50 need not receive annual screening for breast cancer with mammographies.

    According to several female experts at a school luncheon today, this is obviously connected to the evil "public option" being advocated by the muslin socialists sans birth certification others, who are now in the process of usurping our freedoms. And it has to be that wealthy white Christian women are going to be deprived of insurance coverage for life-saving tests, by the government, in order to facilitate the swamping of our genetic purity with darker skins, who haven't had insurance in the first place, anyway.

    I only wish there were a forum for blog science about "health reform" to equal in accuracy and reason, this fabulous blog science website.

    Sigh. One can dream...

    ReplyDelete
  17. I contacted the Blog science experts from Realclimate.org regarding their sock puppet blogs and they assured me that they don't try to look computer illiterate, they actually are! I was stunned by this confession from expert Blog science reviewers.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "Yesterday I contacted EBSCO to suggest that they examine the peer-reviewed status of E&E, and pointed them to this website.

    I just had an email from EBSCO saying that their Publishing Editorial Department agrees that E&E is not peer-reviewed, and will be changing its designation accordingly." Michael Ashley
    http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/poptarts-450-climate-change-denier-lies/#comment-6029

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wrinkled Retainer19 November 2009 17:25

    PT,

    That's exposing the ecowarmist environazis for the charlatans they are! They CLAIM to make COMPUTER models of the weather for HUNDREDS of YEARS into the future but they are COMPUTER ILLITERATE.

    Great work! I look forward to your Blog Science Paper on the subject. I hope you will extend Dr Inferno the courtesy of offering him (or her?) the first opportunity of publishing this breakthrough paper.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Wrinkled Retainer19 November 2009 17:33

    It seems we have a warmist among us. Greenfyre is a notorious econazi hater of Freedom. Just look how he has muzzled Prof PT! It's a disgrace!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Armchair Climate Expert19 November 2009 17:42

    OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG.

    Some Hackers have just totally exposed how much of a scam AGW is by releasing some emails from Phil Jones:

    'I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
    to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
    1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.'

    Blog Hackers are even smarter than Blog Scientists!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  22. @ Rinkled Wetainer

    You can't spot a parody site when you see one????

    Sigh I guess Poe's Law really is true :(

    ReplyDelete
  23. Wrinkled, it is so like "team non-science" to think that when you call computer code by another name it stops following basic computer science logic. Can you believe all those computer illiterates who think Gavin is a computer expert when he does not even have an undergraduate degree in anything computer related? But what else would you expect from a Blog science reviewer?

    I've started on the paper, this is what I have so far,

    1+1=2

    I have replicated the experiment on 10,000 computer systems and 1+1=2, EVERYTIME!!!!!

    This is going to cause problems because I was hoping to get 1+1=1.84546576 and show how "close enough" is ok. Maybe Dr. Inferno could co-author with me so I could show other Blog science reviewers like Gavin who are more "expert" with these computers thingies than those with "computer" science degrees from colleges like MIT and UC Berkley who is BOSS!

    ReplyDelete
  24. greenfry

    I think ClimatAdict is a parerdy of a site cuz it duznt have any nice pictyers like ours duz.

    HTH x

    ReplyDelete
  25. Wait I have figured out the problem, I was sent a new updated Mannian smoothing technique to deal with the error.

    I forgot to apply a first order forcing parameter, using the following code...

    [EXECUTE][DISPLAY: Begin Mannian Method](INPUT)1*(54)^677878-4444447)+(989-+^@go elite rocket)&/*5333(thermal destruction)+/-(make up number)=(replace result with 1.84546576)[END]

    The results are all 1.84546576 Now!!!!!!!

    Thank you Blog science, I could never have done it with out you!!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. 'I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
    to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
    1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.'

    This must be a forged email. The warmist's temperatures are FAKE, and they know it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. greenfyre said...

    You can't spot a parody site when you see one????

    and then links to his own site with a claim that DenialDepot is a joke! Greenfyre, not content with cherry-picking a strawman, has engaged in a gratuitous ad hominem.

    And what sort of a name is "greenfyre" anyway? At least here at DenialDepot Dr Inferno and his blog community don't hide behind pseudonyms or purloin the names of random 17th century historical figures.

    Dirk,
    Blog Science Expert Reviewer
    84 posts to Blog Professorship

    ReplyDelete
  28. I've been trying to post my paper results to the warmerer in chief site at Fenton Communications, I mean Environmental Media Services, I mean RealClimate.org but I am not getting through.

    Did Al Gore tell Arlie Schardt to lock it down?

    Blog Science for the win!

    ReplyDelete
  29. @ Dirk

    "claim that DenialDepot is a joke! "

    [forehead slap] ... and what would you expect on a site parodying a warmist site? praise for DD? ... well duh!

    "And what sort of a name is "greenfyre" anyway?"

    Moldavian, why?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Andrew,

    You said: "I was stunned by this confession from expert Blog science reviewers"

    Watch your language. They're not worth the title expert Blog Science reviewers. They are peer review "scientists". They prove whatever the orders are from Gore & Hansen.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Andrew,

    "I have replicated the experiment on 10,000 computer systems"

    That reeks of climate models. You watch it buddy, that's you're second transgression in as many posts. We do not want to have anything to do with computer models or computers and we most certainly do not want to bestow the title of "expert Blog science reviewer" to the Realclimate peer review inbreeding herd.

    Three strike and you're out.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Professor Squareroot20 November 2009 04:02

    I have begun to sift through the damning evidence and to say I am flabergasted would be a mild understatement.

    Here is a snippet showing that the bounders don't even know what they are doing

    > The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at > > > > > the moment and it is a travesty that we can't. The CERES data
    > > > > > published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there > > > > > should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. > > > > > Our observing system is inadequate.
    > > > > >

    By the way, does anyone know how to decipher the arrows?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Wrinkled Retainer20 November 2009 04:05

    Greenfyre,

    "You can't spot a parody site when you see one????"

    Ah, so your own site is a parody of warmists, as is your previous post here. That would explain why it contained not a word of praise for either Dr Inferno or Prof PT.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Even as a skeptic I enjoy your blog very much. You're on the nail a lot of the time and this post echoes many of my exact thoughts - 450 papers, oh that sounds like a lot, E&E, yawn etc. You are right that there a some total twats on my side. But again Gore's recent million deg C shows that neither side is consistent.

    However, I think there might be a real change of climate coming if those CRU e-mails are real. I only raise it here 'cos your sense of humour makes you smart enough to see that. I think there will several climate scientists on the phone to their lawyers today. I mean we're not talking ethics committees and retractions here. This could escalate to conspiracy to defraud charges and so on. It's not surprising that the warmersphere is so quiet - like little children caught torturing a cat by a grown up.

    I think horse, stable, bolted when I read James' words on this issue:
    "Remember, never say anything in an email if you aren't prepared to see it plastered over the internet subsequently!"

    ReplyDelete
  35. Wrinkled Retainer20 November 2009 04:25

    Dirk,

    I'm not entirely convinced by Greenfly's claims. He says that he's a parody warmist but he's just a bit too much like the real thing. Just look at his jack-booted suppression of PT's obvious FACTS with a never ending stream of abuse and ad hominem.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Moldavian? This reminds me of an occasion when I made a purchase in a store below the Mason-Dixon line. The nice saleslady squinted at my credit card and then pronounced my surname, correctly. "That's pretty good!" I said. "Most people get it wrong, although I don't know why, it's phonetic."

    She looked puzzled. "Oh, is that somewhere in Europe?"

    ReplyDelete
  37. Baron von Mocnkhofen20 November 2009 05:28

    Yes, in one of the hacked emails the CRU criminals admit they had added real temperature data to the hockey stick. And it is true: look here! You see the commie-red stuff at the end? That is the real temperature data that the bastards tried to sneak into the graph! They should be fired and sent to the galleys, the whole bunch of them!

    ReplyDelete
  38. Im reely exited abt the email skandle! this is the sort of stuf i reely luv and can understand. I can imagin the movie of it with some1 like Ruslle Crow in the roll of Mr Makintosh exposing the nasty warmo-fakists ploting in their bunker at Hadgate and maybe he desides that the only way to save the world from the commy cooling plot is to hack in with a big hacking thing and blow up the hole place but then maybe at the last min his gf whos a reporter brakes the story and the police suround the bunker and then shoot it out with the fakists. Then there almost all shot but one of them has ploted to blow up the world as a last resoyrt and hes abt to push the big red buton but Makintosh jumps on him justin tyme and the fakist falls on to a tempreture spike and dies horibly with it stiking uo thru him then Makintosh and his gf have sex but tastfuly then at the end Makintosh is made hed of the climate and evrythings ok.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Baron von Monckhofen20 November 2009 06:17

    As somebody said over at the briefing room:

    It was only a matter time before someone stuck a knife into the bloated viscera that is the climate change community and allow the whole stinking load of rotted guts to spill out for all the world to see.

    ReplyDelete
  40. genetically modified organism20 November 2009 08:57

    The esteemed Dr Inferno's recommendation on avoiding context in reading the growing scientific literature destroying the communist warming hoax only makes perfect sense. Graph the numbers of those papers - that would be a real hockey stick!

    Trying to understand the science of climate is indeed like trying to understand the warped ('warmped'?) psychology of the ecofascist bedwetters. We know they all, led by Gore & Hansen, want to destroy the entire world economy because of their hate of humanity. We also know they want to dominate the world economy and grow rich like through "green" techonology and massive research grants. We also know they want to impose a socialist world order.

    You must think about these things one at a time to understand all of them. Just like freedom and greatness is based on individuality. The warmists insist on "context" and thinking of all the ideas together. That is basically socialized reasoning. They want all the ideas to work together toward a common conclusion. How absurd! They will never take my freedom to have independent ideas different from those the IPCC wants to impose on everyone.

    That there is currently warming only naturally-caused and that there is currently global cooling may seem contradictory to the tree-hugging communists, but I proudly believe both are true and that the free hand of the market will ultimately prove which one is the truthiest.

    ReplyDelete
  41. About the recently released emails, where are the emails from uber-warmist Al giving the envirofascists their marching orders?

    Unless ... since he invented the internet, he planted packet filters to remove all traces of his nefarious activities!

    Whew, the tinfoil must be working, or else I would never have resisted the mind control rays trying to get me to ignore this
    IMPORTANT information which should be DISSEMINATED.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I agree with Tracy that it shd be inseminated so ive given it to my bf. Hes gouing to read it all owt on yootoob. Hes an acter so he can do all the diffrnt voyces.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Baron von Monckhofen20 November 2009 11:11

    Here is an email from Jones to Gore:

    ----

    From: Phil Jones
    To: fatal@vxxxxx.xxx
    Subject: Fwd: John L. Daly dead
    Date: Thu Jan 29 14:17:01 2004

    Hail Great Leader of our Great Green Cause,

    Your master plan is working excellently. Soon we control all the use of energy in the world, and then we also control the world.

    The only ones who can stop us are those pesky climate skeptics, always poking their noses where they dont belong. Shall we start operation "Black Helicopters"?

    We await your command, oh Magnifienlty Fat One.

    Ever your obedient lackey,

    Phil Jones

    ----

    You can see that nit is a genuine email, because it even has spellnig mistakes in it.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Baron von Monckhofen20 November 2009 13:49

    Another genuine email from the CRU archives has come to our notice. Terrifying things indeed...

    ----

    From: Al Gore
    To: jones@vxxxxx.xxx
    Subject: Orders from the leader
    Date: Thu Jan 29 14:17:01 1998

    You must eliminate the medieval warming period! Use any means you find necessary. Then humanity can be pushed back to use only medieval technology, and Great Cthulu shall rise from his house at R'lyeh and the Deep Ones shall once more rule earth!

    Cthulhu fhtagn!

    Al Gore, aka Nrd'ungr Shuboth

    -----

    ReplyDelete
  45. Bin away for a whilem, and what do I see the best news in decades: all personal emails of all those warmist "scientists" in the open.

    Yes!!!

    Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaame Oooooooooooooverrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  46. 450 papers? Is this the best we can do - that, and some boring emails?? WHERE ARE THE SEXY VIDEOS??? Hasn't at least on of the "scientist warmists" been caught in a bathroom stall at the Minneapolis Airport in a wide stance position?? How about a love child or two?

    C'mon blog scientists, jazz it up!

    ReplyDelete
  47. It goes way beyond global warming. Recently revealed letters from Isaac Newton and his followers reveal the typical team scientist pattern of hiding/"correcting" data, calling critics names, basically everything we've come to expect from a bankrupt science.

    Unfortunately we can only go by the selected excerpts on the web and guess the rest of what these guys are hiding. The full text seems to be locked up in some library on some inaccessible continent. What are these classical physicists trying to hide?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Big Fan, you are on to something. We blog scientist fans (I'm not a scientist, just a fan) need to encourage the real professional blog scientists to expand their scope.

    Why restrict yourselves to the - admittedly noble - refutation of warmism?

    I think it's time to connect the dots between that sort of extreme alarmism, not to say global conspiracy, with the other conspiracies that are of course, all connected.

    I would include "theories" of evolution, plate tectonics, and gravity at the top of the list. But why not go after the notion of orbits in the solar system while we're at it. And since government funded "scientists" can't fully explain the big bang, well, that should go out the window too.

    It's time to look at the big picture, people!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Hello, Doctor Inferno!
    It's been raining here for most nights so I have not been able to go to walk to check on those 'searchlights' I noticed onthe last observation walk. But yesterday, it was a
    clear night and I went to look what those are. Now, they wer clearli showing in the clouds the last time, but yesternight I couldn't locate them. Have they been moved?!? Aniway, much kless of those greedy warmists around this time, but it was so cold out there htat it was no wonder. I did not see anything very suspicious in the sky, just a blinkin light
    that moved way faster than any natural object I know of, it could have been a helicopter or a plain, could'nt make out wath color. No sign of htose space rocks. Yours, Astral student

    ReplyDelete
  50. At first I welcomed this list but soon started growing concerned is was actually a warmist plot.

    As any blog scientist knows the jackboots of Jones and Mann prevent journals from publishing any science that reveals the hoax that is AGW, which is why we must turn to blog science to hear the truth. So how could so many have slipped through under the noses of the warmist overlords?

    Through blog science I might have a partial answer, one of the 450 is an erratum to an earlier listed paper. I havn't read the paper by blogsense tells me the first paper was just a front so the AGW hoax could be exposed in the erratum. Surely this a model blog science could learn from.

    ReplyDelete
  51. My friends, I'm so glad I found this blog! Not too long ago I came across this quote that I wanted to share with you all:

    "The good Christian should beware of scientists and all those who make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that scientists have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and confine man in the bonds of Hell." - St. Augustine

    There you go - why should we trust these "scientists" if they may have made a deal with the devil? Have you ever seen a scientist in church? I think that says enough really!

    ReplyDelete
  52. thanks for the information on this blog! I find it very interesting and entertaining! hopefully soon have updates that I love your post! I thank you too!
    buy viagra
    viagra online
    generic viagra

    ReplyDelete
  53. Christian Louboutin shoes came into existence in 1992 in Paris. These red soled Christian Louboutin Pumps stilettos are desired and leached at by women all around the world. These Christian Louboutin Boots are perfect for a splendid evening, with an elegant evening gown that has a deep neck line. These elegant Christian Louboutin Sandals would enhance and add to the sexy look that you already enjoy.

    You can get a X MEN ANIMATED that is rewritable, or those that allow you to erase previous data on X MEN ANIMATED DVD and storing a new one on X MEN ANIMATED DVD COLLECTION .

    And now it isn't difficult to shop for that great ED Hardy that you've always wanted. With online hardy shirt shopping being so easy and convenient, you can shop from us in the comfort of your home. Our online shopping portal has the total hardy shirt collection for you to choose from. Just log in and take a pick of the things you want. Choose your hardy shirts today and show off your style.

    ReplyDelete
  54. interesting! although I have no expert, but I want have to know more and more, on your blog just interesting and useful information. Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  55. Great website, looks very clean and organized. Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  56. This is the mistake warmists make. Global warming skeptics know that reading papers is not an exercise in understanding the state of the science, but an exercise of finding spanners to throw in the wheels of manmade global warming. dog crate

    ReplyDelete
  57. I can imagin the movie of it with some1 like Ruslle Crow in the roll of Mr Makintosh exposing the nasty warmo-fakists ploting in their bunker at Hadgate african mango extract

    ReplyDelete
  58. I am so glad this internet thing works and your article really helped me.Might take you up on that home advice you!At same time,you can visit my website: heat pump troubleshooting

    ReplyDelete
  59. As any blog scientist knows the jackboots of Jones and Mann prevent journals from publishing any science that reveals the hoax that is AGW, which is why we must turn to blog science to hear the truth. So how could so many have slipped through under the noses of the warmist overlords?

    ReplyDelete
  60. This is the mistake warmists make. Global warming skeptics know that reading papers is not an exercise in understanding the state of the science, Click here for more information

    ReplyDelete
  61. There are also some great political speeches in some of the papers and one uses an introduction quote by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. exterior window trimand building materials are among the best in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I think this is proof that the scientific conspiarcy to advance the warming agenda and cash in on offset $$$ is falling apart high efficiency detergent

    ReplyDelete
  63. The outcome of the game wasn't much better. The Cardinals scored all of their runs in the seventh inning in a 12-0 pasting of the Cubs. homemade cake recipes from scratch

    ReplyDelete
  64. This is the mistake warmists make. Global warming skeptics know that reading papers is not an exercise in understanding the state of the science, but an exercise of finding spanners to throw in the wheels of manmade global warming.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a great man, so I think that he did fervent advocate of justice and personally investigated two closed cases, which led to two men being exonerated of the crimes of which they were accused.

    ReplyDelete
  66. I am so glad this internet thing works and your article really helped me.Might take you up on that home advice you!At same time,you can visit my website:

    ReplyDelete
  67. I have browse theDiablo 3 Items listing of 350 document and will confirm that it is extremely technological, lengthy, buy D3 Gold really effective and personal references numerous subjects. They are incredibly creidlbe, buy D3 items too, becuase the authors usually are stated using their very first companies as Buy GW2 Gold merely name, a indicate of fine technology.

    ReplyDelete
  68. This is highly informatics, well-written and smartly described blog. dauphine

    ReplyDelete
  69. I appreciate you for spreading the. It had become a terrific lead concerning how to web log accordingly. Posts it is is incredibly very clear and even finely detailed listed here. Count on your own composing later on Jocelyn

    ReplyDelete
  70. Nice ressource internet the post is very important thanks you cadorama

    ReplyDelete
  71. Battleground wow gold kaufen und Landwirtschaft. Einige Leute dachten auch Ideen für die Zukunft Freizeitaktivitäten, einige von denen sind wirklich gut. Zum Beispiel in der AH, können wir eine Dartscheibe für Spieler setzen, um Spaß mit bei dem Versuch, Zeit zu vertreiben haben. Für Berufe, wie etwa Schneider machen Seile? Seit der Veröffentlichung des WLK Expansion haben viele Dinge im Spiel verändert. wow gold kaufen per telefonrechnung Der Preis für einige Elemente haben sich drastisch seit der Veröffentlichung der Erweiterung verändert. Sie können den Preis ändern, reich zu werden.Für Zunft, wie etwa einer täglichen Status, ähnlich Facebook, lassen Sie Ihre Gildenmitglieder kennen Sie Ihren Tag planen? usw. Es klingt gut. Vielleicht in der Zukunft wird es in der WoW Spiel wow kaufen erscheinen. Es wird interessanter, wow gold zu gewinnen.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Glad to visit your site. An awesome blog. Nice Information It's really very informative that I wanted ever, thanks for this. Jual Peninggi Badan Alami Bali Ratih Obat Jerawat Obat Asam Urat AlamiKapsul Mengkudu Obat Pelangsing Badan HerbalMadu Hitam Pahit Masker Wajah Alami

    ReplyDelete